[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
.Thanks also to Greig de Peuter and Enda Brophy, for allowing me to make extensive use of their work on the circuits of cell phone exploitation; to Tony Weis, for advice on land-grabs, enclosures and primitive accumulation; to Tobias Nagl, for translations of the work of Karl Heinz Roth; to Warren Steele, for conversations on Jünger, Ballard and weather machines; to Kane Faucher, for vortical discussions; to Sarah T.Roberts, for permission to cite her forthcoming work on commercial content moderation; to my friend Gil Warren, for help finding a few bright political glimmers in a generally dark scene; to two long-time comrades and colleagues, Dorothy Kidd and Santiago Valles, for the example of their scholarly work and political engagements; to the editors of the Digital Barricades series, for helpful revision suggestions; to Tim Clark, for incisive copy editing; and to David Castle at Pluto Press, for his great editorial patience.Thanks, finally, to all who have over the years accused me of being ‘too optimistic’; this book is for you.1ProletariatDeep Knowledge VenturesOn 13 May 2014, a press release from Deep Knowledge Ventures, a Hong Kong-based venture capital fund specializing in biotechnology, age-related disease drugs and regenerative medicine projects, announced that it ‘formally acknowledges VITAL, a crucial Artificial Intelligence instrument for investment decision-making, as an equal member of its Board of Directors’.VITAL was the product of Aging Analytics UK, a provider of health-sector market intelligence to pension funds, insurers and governments.Developed by ‘a team of programmers, several of which have theoretical physics backgrounds’, the system ‘uses machine learning to analyze financing trends in a database of life science companies and predict successful investments’.VITAL 1.0 was a ‘basic algorithm’, but the goal was ‘through iterative releases and updates … to create a piece of software that is capable of making autonomous investment decisions’ (Fontaine 2014).Apparently, however, Deep Knowledge Ventures thought VITAL was already pretty good: it told reporters the program would ‘vote on whether to invest in a specific company or not’ (BBC 2014).All this sounded very futuristic.As commentators quickly pointed out, however, it was really ‘publicity hype’ (BBC 2014).This was not because decision-making algorithms are impossible, but, on the contrary, because their use, often in forms far more complex than VITAL, is commonplace in today’s capitalism.Such programs are, for example, central to the operations of the financial sector, whose high-speed multi-billion trades are entirely dependent on algorithms – and whose bad decisions brought the world economy to its knees in the great Wall Street crash of 2008.The press release was a stunt because the future to which it seemed to point exists now.Whatever interest VITAL’s debut may have stirred was immediately eclipsed by more sombre news.On the same day 301 workers died in a massive explosion at Turkey’s Soma coal mine.The mine, once publicly owned, had been privatized in 2007.The disaster was caused by neglect of safety equipment generally attributed to profit-boosting cost-cutting.The miners’ charred and choked bodies were pulled to the surface from two miles underground: they would not be needing regenerative medicine and anti-aging treatments, to which, of course, they would never have had access anyway.Turkish trade unions declared a one-day general strike.At the same time, street protests burst out in Istanbul, Ankara, Izmir and other cities across Turkey.Students calling on the government to resign wore hard hats to show solidarity with the miners.They were met with tear gas and rubber bullets.These protests were a continuation of the social turmoil that had raged intermittently since the occupation of Gezi Park in Istanbul’s Taksim Square in May of 2013.That occupation, started to protect a grove of trees from the construction of an Ottoman-barrack themed shopping mall, had rapidly become a focus for discontent with the religiously conservative neoliberal capitalism of President Erdogan’s regime.It lasted for 17 days.In some 5,000 related demonstrations across Turkey, 11 people were killed and more than 8,000 injured, many seriously.Throughout the unrests, protests and criticism of the government had been mobilized through social media, provoking a farcical attempt by the Erdogan regime to ban Twitter and YouTube.This ban, though universally violated, had only been formally rescinded six weeks before the Soma disaster.Now, social media again disseminated news, first of the scale of the catastrophe, initially minimized by the government, and then of the fresh protests: a photograph of an advisor to President Erdogan savagely drop-kicking a demonstrator held down by security forces in the streets of Soma circulated widely (Saul 2014).The same-day news of the algorithmic boss-entity and the mine disaster was coincidence.Yet it condenses paradoxes and contradictions central to this book.For a start, it starkly highlights the coexistence within contemporary capitalism of extraordinary high-technologies and workers who live and die in brutal conditions often imagined to belong in some antediluvian past.This coexistence is also a connection.Mines and artificial intelligences seem to belong to different worlds, but they are strongly linked.Although only a small part of production at Soma went to power plants, similar coal mines around the planet provide – at appalling, biosphere-endangering environmental cost – the basic energy source on which all digital technologies depend: electricity
[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
© 2009 Każdy czyn dokonany w gniewie jest skazany na klęskę - Ceske - Sjezdovky .cz. Design downloaded from free website templates